|
American Chemistry Society (distributed by Oxford University Press, New
York), 1998. 446 pp. ISBN 0-8412-3444-2. $24.95.
This is a novel, useful, well-illustrated and
generally well-written book that seeks to direct travelers to places
of scientific interest: a kind of Michelin guide without
the judgmental stars and worth-a-detour admonitions.
Each listing is accompanied by a one- to two-page essay
outlining the local attractions. While some of these would seem
to derive from publicity material, most bear witness to
the Cohens' peripatetic research. One result of this is a
certain bicoastal bias: there are 23 entries each for New York
State and California, while Wisconsin merits only 3, Michigan
2, and Iowa and Indiana 1 each! After all, there is a
computer museum in Minnesota as well as in Boston and a Bakken
Institute of Electricity and Life in Minneapolis as well
as similar places in Philadelphia. But these Rodney
Dangerfield carpings aside, the authors have done an excellent job
of highlighting many famous and not a few obscure (the
Wagner Free Institute of Science and Bartram's Garden, both
in Philadelphia, and the Indiana Medical History Museum
in Indianapolis) places that are well worth a passing visit.
"Scientific treasures" is a rather indefinite term and
criteria for inclusion in a book such as this are
difficult to define. Several zoos are deservedly cited but others are
not listed. Incidentally, one is saddened to see the Bronx
Zoo reduced to answering to the nice-nellyism of
"International Wildlife Conservation Park". The De Soto Caverns Park
in Childersburg, Alabama, makes the list but Mammoth
Cave in Kentucky and Carlsbad Caverns in New Mexico do
not. The site of America's first glass shop is here but the site
of the first sustained nuclear reaction, with its
hauntingly ambivalent Henry Moore sculpture, is not. I realize that
a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, but
a certain balance is surely a scientific virtue.
Another problem arises with nontraditional venues.
Is EPCOT center not a showplace for science and
technology? Since children are often accompanying baggage on
touring vacations, and since, as I can vouch from personal
experience, they often show a mulish intolerance towards
traditional museums, should attention not be paid to the many
fine children's museums that have sprung up in the last 15
years? That in Indianapolis, one of the largest and best, has,
thanks to the generosity of the Eli Lilly Company, a strong
science component.
But enough of quibbles. This is a splendid first
iteration. Several years ago J. M. and M. J. Cohen issued a
revised edition of their The Penguin Dictionary of Modern
Quotations. On the cover an enthusiastic reviewer is quoted as
saying "Carry on Cohens, we need you." In the hope and
expectation that this book will also prosper I can only echo that
statement.
|