JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2003  > September  >
Chemical Education Today
Editorial
A Report on Reports
John W. Moore
Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706


Before you get caught up in the overwhelmimg nitty-gritty of a new academic year, take some time to reflect on the learning environment in your classes last year and how you could improve it this year.

Cover
September 2003
Vol. 80 No. 9
p. 975

Full Text
Last year, instead of its usual annual report on its own activities, Project Kaleidoscope released a summary of recommendations from 13 reports that have appeared over the past two decades (1). Subtitled Report on Reports, the Kaleidoscope document provides access to a great deal of wise and useful commentary on the education of undergraduates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in the U.S. and elsewhere. If you have not already read it, or the reports to which it refers, please take the time to do so.

The reports differ widely in membership and experience of the group that created them, in the years when they were released (from 1986 through 2001), and in sponsorship (from government agencies, through scientific societies and national boards, to independent agencies of change such as Kaleidoscope itself). Nevertheless, the reports have a common theme: There needs to be broad adoption in STEM disciplines of learning environments that

  • Encourage investigation
  • Enable students to make connections with fields other than the one they are studying
  • Suggest practical applications related to students’ own experiences or goals
  • Involve communities where faculty and students are partners in learning

In addition government agencies, institutions of postsecondary education, faculty, and the general public need to resolve to make education in STEM disciplines a much higher priority and to cooperate and collaborate with a broad range of colleagues and organizations to improve it.

Perhaps this commonality of theme is not so surprising, given that the reports were largely created by groups of individuals who had participated in changing their own local learning environments, who had experimented to see what worked and what did not, and who were eager to help others to do the same. The results of a broad range of such experiments clearly have led to a consensus about what should be done and how it can be done. Now we need to broaden the impact from those who are early adopters and very enthusiastic to many others who are directly involved in postsecondary STEM education but have not yet incorporated these themes into their individual educational activities.

Considerable progress has already been made toward the goals listed above, and this can be seen in the changing recommendations over time. For example, the Neal Report in 1986 called on academic institutions to “Engage all faculty, including research faculty, in the instruction of undergraduates” (2). In 2000 the National Science and Technology Council called on federal agencies to “Enhance the dialog on integration of research and education” (3). In the interim the National Science Foundation and other granting agencies have provided programs to encourage inclusion of undergraduates in research and to require that funded projects demonstrate broad impact on society. On the other hand, some recommendations remain nearly unchanged. In 1986 the Neal Report encouraged academic institutions to “Build collaborations with other educational institutions, including K–12, and with industry.” In 1999 a National Research Council report, How People Learn, asked that we “Build local and global communities of teachers, administrators, parents, and others interested in learning” (4). Clearly we still have much to do.

The beginning of a new school year is an excellent time to think about how undergraduate courses and programs can be strengthened and revitalized. Before you get caught up in the overwhelming nitty-gritty of a new academic year, take some time to reflect on the learning environment in your classes last year and how you could improve it this year. Kaleidoscope’s summary of nearly two decades of reports is a great place to start. I strongly encourage you to obtain it, read it, and, most importantly of all, act on it.


Literature Cited

  1. Narum, Jeanne L., Ed. Recommendations for Action in Support of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics; Project Kaleidoscope: Washington, DC, 2002. (Accessed Jul 2003.)
  2. Neal, Homer A., Chair, NSB Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education. Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education; National Science Foundation: Washington, DC, 1986 (NSB 86-100).
  3. National Science and Technology Council. Ensuring a Strong U.S. Scientific, Technical, and Engineering Workforce in the 21st Century, April 2000 (Accessed Jul 2003.)
  4. Bransford, John D.; Brown, Ann L.; Cocking, Rodney R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1999; (accessed Jul 2003).
More Information
*  Citation
Moore, John W. J. Chem. Educ. 2003 80 975.
*  Keywords
Collaborative / Cooperative Learning; Curriculum; Teaching / Learning Theory / Practice
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
August 4, 2003
February 28, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2003  > September  > Page 975



Chemistry Teacher Connection

The "Chemistry Teacher Connection" (CTC) is especially for high school chemistry teachers. For only $40/year, it offers an online-only subscription to CLIC along with membership in the Division of Chemical Education, normally $65/year. CTC subscribers receive access to all articles and supplements from 1996 through the current issue.


C&EN CLICs

Through special arrangement with the ACS, JCE High School CLIC is now able to provide subscribers with online access to Chemical & Engineering News articles that have been selected specifically for secondary science instructors and their students. 


JCE Collections Available
Occasionally, collections of JCE back issues become available for donation to individual teachers, schools, or libraries. JCE matches collections with interested recipients. Recipients pay shipping costs or pick up the collection.

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Subscriptions

Fishing for New Ideas
Always in the
process of
improving, CLIC
welcomes ideas and comments.

Email Us