JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print
   Current Issue
 Previous Issues
 Supplements
 Search JCE Index

JCE Digital Library
   DigiDemos
 QBank
 SymMath
 WebWare

JCE Software
   Latest Releases
 Software & Video
 Downloads
 Support

Only@JCE Online
   JCE Online Store
 JCE HS CLIC
 JCE Discussion Forums
   Biographical Snapshots
 ChemEd Resource Shelf
 Featured Molecules
 Hal's Picks
 Project Chemlab
 Reviewed WWW Sites
 "Web-Ed" Articles

About JCE
   Features
 Publications
 Operations
 Outreach
 Contact Us


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2005  > January  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
Evaluating Students' Conceptual Understanding of Balanced Equations and Stoichiometric Ratios Using a Particulate Drawing
Michael J. Sanger
Department of Chemistry, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132
Cover
January 2005
Vol. 82 No. 1
p. 131
Abstract
A total of 156 students were asked to provide free-response balanced chemical equations for a classic multiple-choice particulate-drawing question first used by Nurrenbern and Pickering. The balanced equations and the number of students providing each equation are reported in this study. The most common student errors included a confusion between the concepts of subscripts and coefficients and including unreacted chemical species in the equation. Equations consistent with two of the five choices used in Nurrenbern and Pickering’s question appeared in this study, but none of the students provided balanced equations consistent with the other three distractors. Suggestions for better distractors are provided in this paper. The students were also asked to perform two stoichiometric calculations using the balanced equation they generated. These responses were evaluated to determine whether the students had a grasp of simple stoichiometric calculations and the reacting ratios of the two starting materials. Students who demonstrated confusion between subscripts and coefficients performed worse on the stoichiometric calculations than students who did not confuse these concepts. Most of the students who provided balanced equations including unreacted chemical species performed stoichiometric calculations using the incorrect reacting ratios of the starting materials listed in the equation.
More Information
*  Citation
 Sanger, Michael J. J. Chem. Educ. 2005 82 131.
*  Keywords
 CER Misconceptions; CER Particulate Nature of Matter; General Chemistry; Introductory / High School Chemistry; Stoichiometry
*  History
 Created:
Last Updated:		 November 29, 2004
December 8, 2004
<< Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article >>
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2005 > January > Page 131


Subscriptions
 Subscription Info
 Order Forms

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
 JCE HS CLIC

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission
 Contributors' Corner

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
 Recent Advertisers

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.
 Outreach with JCE

Comments to
jceonline@chem.wisc.edu		 Copyright © Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society.
All rights reserved.