JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > January  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions
Lydia T. Tien
Department of Chemistry and Geosciences, Monroe Community College, Rochester, NY 14623
Melonie A. Teichert and Dawn Rickey,
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1872
Cover
January 2007
Vol. 84 No. 1
p. 175

Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.
Supplement
An expanded version of this article, including analyses of the progression of student ideas toward more scientifically accurate ideas, students’ perceptions of the lab module, and all institutional data, is available.
*
Download
Contents
More Information
*
Citation
Tien, Lydia T.; Teichert, Melonie A.; Rickey, Dawn. J. Chem. Educ. 2007 84 175.
*
Keywords
Aqueous Solution Chemistry; Chemical Education Research; Conductivity; First-Year Undergraduate / General; Inquiry-Based / Discovery Learning; Ionic Bonding; Laboratory Instruction; Misconceptions / Discrepant Events; Solutions / Solvents
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
12/5/2006
12/12/2006
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > January  > Page 175



Chemistry Teacher Connection

The "Chemistry Teacher Connection" (CTC) is especially for high school chemistry teachers. For only $40/year, it offers an online-only subscription to CLIC along with membership in the Division of Chemical Education, normally $65/year. CTC subscribers receive access to all articles and supplements from 1996 through the current issue.


C&EN CLICs

Through special arrangement with the ACS, JCE High School CLIC is now able to provide subscribers with online access to Chemical & Engineering News articles that have been selected specifically for secondary science instructors and their students. 


JCE Collections Available
Occasionally, collections of JCE back issues become available for donation to individual teachers, schools, or libraries. JCE matches collections with interested recipients. Recipients pay shipping costs or pick up the collection.

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Subscriptions

Fishing for New Ideas
Always in the
process of
improving, CLIC
welcomes ideas and comments.

Email Us