JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > November  >
Chemical Education Today
Editorial
Opportunities for Collaborations among Scholars
John W. Moore
Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Cover
November 2007
Vol. 84 No. 11
p. 1735

Full Text
“ Scholarship in the chemical sciences and engineering may include discovery of chemical principles, integration of chemical knowledge within both formal academic and informal public arenas, application of chemical knowledge to new problems and situations, and the study of teaching and learning of chemistry and related sciences.”

American Chemical Society

The quotation on this page is from a revised statement on scholarship recently approved by the Board of Directors of the American Chemical Society (1). It recognizes a broader scope of scholarship, provides more detailed information about and more examples of scholarship, and reiterates the importance of the work of Ernest Boyer (2). I have commented previously about these subjects, as have others (3). ACS’s approval of this revised document provides an opportunity to revisit the statement’s implications and to suggest ways we can act to advance and improve scholarship—both traditional and as envisioned by Boyer. In 1990 Boyer expanded the definition of scholarship to include discovery of new knowledge (research), integration of knowledge through connections across disciplines, application of knowledge to consequential problems, and teaching and transmission of knowledge. The new ACS statement explicitly recognizes these four scholarships and states that all of them require “originality, creativity, a thorough grounding in the previous accomplishments of other scholars, and effective communication of new contributions, making them available for analysis, critical review, refinement and elaboration by other scholars”.

Not everyone accepts this broader definition of scholarship, nor does everyone ascribe the same importance to each of the four scholarships. That is unfortunate, because it inhibits both faculty and students from participating more enthusiastically and effectively in those aspects of scholarship that generate less kudos. What can we do about this, short of brainwashing recalcitrant colleagues?

One approach is to be more proactive about collaborating with those involved in traditional research. Successful collaborations on important projects is far more likely to generate acceptance for non-traditional scholarship than are exhortation or castigation. The impetus toward such collaborations has recently increased, because federal funding agencies require that successful proposals must include a clear statement of the broader impacts of the studies proposed (4). Most of us are in excellent positions to collaborate on many types of activities that involve broader impacts, and many of our colleagues who have less knowledge of outreach, pre-college education, or chemical education research can make effective use of our knowledge.

Here are some activities listed by the NSF as examples of broader impact (4).

Participate in the recruitment, training, and/or professional development of K–12 science and math teachers. Develop, adopt, adapt or disseminate effective models and pedagogic approaches to science, mathematics and engineering teaching. Establish research and education collaborations with students and/or faculty who are members of underrepresented groups. Participate in developing new approaches (e.g., use of information technology and connectivity) to engage underserved individuals, groups, and communities in science and engineering. Partner with museums, nature centers, science centers, and similar institutions to develop exhibits in science, math, and engineering. Make data available in a timely manner by means of data bases, digital libraries, or other venues such as CD-ROMs. Integrate research with education activities in order to communicate in a broader context. Analyze, interpret, and synthesize research and education results in formats understandable and useful for non-scientists.

There are many more. I expect that readers could easily expand NSF’s list significantly.

Here is a great opportunity for collaborations to develop between those in traditional research and those in chemical education. I have personally been involved in several such collaborations. They are useful for me and for other (usually much younger) faculty. In some cases graduate students are working on projects that combine traditional research with chemical education activities. These students have an opportunity to follow their interest in chemical education as well as in traditional research. In the future they will be much more likely to participate in such collaborations themselves. I encourage you to offer to collaborate (on an equal basis) with colleagues who are looking for good ways to incorporate broader impacts into their professional efforts. This is a win–win situation. Let’s take advantage of it.

JWM

Literature Cited

  1. ACS Office of Legislative and Government Affairs, Statement on Scholarship, 2007 (accessed Sept 2007).
  2. Boyer, Ernest L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate; Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: Princeton, NJ, 1990. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for Research Universities; State University of New York at Stony Brook: Stony Brook, NY, 1998 (accessed Sept 2007).
  3. Moore, J. W. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 741; Moore, J. W. J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75, 935; Moore, J. W. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 1383. Russell, A. A.; Pavelich, M. J. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, A268.
  4. March, Peter. Broader Impacts Review Criterion; National Science Foundation, August 2007 (accessed Sept 2007); National Science Foundation. Merit Review Broader Impacts Criterion: Representative Activities July 2007 (accessed Sept 2007).
More Information
*
Citation
Moore, John W. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 1735.
*
Keywords
Communication / Writing; First-Year Undergraduate / General; General Public; High School / Introductory Chemistry; Professional Development; Second-Year Undergraduate
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
9/19/2007
9/24/2007
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > November  > Page 1735



Chemistry Teacher Connection

The "Chemistry Teacher Connection" (CTC) is especially for high school chemistry teachers. For only $40/year, it offers an online-only subscription to CLIC along with membership in the Division of Chemical Education, normally $65/year. CTC subscribers receive access to all articles and supplements from 1996 through the current issue.


C&EN CLICs

Through special arrangement with the ACS, JCE High School CLIC is now able to provide subscribers with online access to Chemical & Engineering News articles that have been selected specifically for secondary science instructors and their students. 


JCE Collections Available
Occasionally, collections of JCE back issues become available for donation to individual teachers, schools, or libraries. JCE matches collections with interested recipients. Recipients pay shipping costs or pick up the collection.

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Subscriptions

Fishing for New Ideas
Always in the
process of
improving, CLIC
welcomes ideas and comments.

Email Us