JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2008  > June  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: A Cognitive Difference
Mark S. Cracolice
Department of Chemistry, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812

John C. Deming
Department of Chemistry, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987

Brian Ehlert
Portland Lutheran High School, Portland, OR 97233

Cover
June 2008
Vol. 85 No. 6
p. 873

Abstract
An initial sample of 94 students enrolled in a first-term general chemistry course was tested with paired algorithmic–conceptual questions, which included questions first used by Nurrenbern and Pickering. The topics of these questions were density, stoichiometry, gas laws, and molarity. Scientific reasoning skill was measured with the Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning. The skills assessed by this instrument are conservation of weight, conservation of displaced volume, proportional thinking, identification and control of variables, probabilistic thinking, correlational thinking, and hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Results showed that success on algorithmic questions was always higher than on conceptual questions, verifying the results of previous studies. Additionally, the students with better reasoning ability outperformed students with poorer reasoning ability on all question types, and the scores of the better reasoners were significantly higher than those of the poorer reasoners on three of the four conceptual questions administered, as well as on the ACS final examination. The results indicate that variation in scientific reasoning skills is one cause of the gap between algorithmic and conceptual problem-solving ability.
Supplement
Set of algorithmic–conceptual question pairs used in this study on general chemistry topics of density, stoichiometry, gas laws, and molarity
*
Download
Contents
More Information
*
Citation
Cracolice, Mark S.; Deming, John C.; Ehlert, Brian. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 873.
*
Keywords
Chemical Education Research; Constructivism; First-Year Undergraduate / General; High School / Introductory Chemistry; Learning Theories; Problem Solving / Decision Making; Professional Development; Standards National / State
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
5/5/2008
5/7/2008
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2008  > June  > Page 873



Chemistry Teacher Connection

The "Chemistry Teacher Connection" (CTC) is especially for high school chemistry teachers. For only $40/year, it offers an online-only subscription to CLIC along with membership in the Division of Chemical Education, normally $65/year. CTC subscribers receive access to all articles and supplements from 1996 through the current issue.


C&EN CLICs

Through special arrangement with the ACS, JCE High School CLIC is now able to provide subscribers with online access to Chemical & Engineering News articles that have been selected specifically for secondary science instructors and their students. 


JCE Collections Available
Occasionally, collections of JCE back issues become available for donation to individual teachers, schools, or libraries. JCE matches collections with interested recipients. Recipients pay shipping costs or pick up the collection.

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Subscriptions

Fishing for New Ideas
Always in the
process of
improving, CLIC
welcomes ideas and comments.

Email Us