|
|
| Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues >
1995
>
November
> |
|
General Interest
|
|
|
|
Success on Algorithmic and LOCS vs. Conceptual Chemistry Exam Questions
|
Uri Zoller and Aviva Lubezky
Department of Science Education-Chemistry, Haifa University Oranim, Kiryat Tivon 36006, Israel
Mary B. Nakhleh and Barbara Tessier
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906
Yehudit J. Dori
Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel
|
|
November 1995
Vol. 72 No. 11
p. 987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract |
|
The performance of freshman science, engineering, and in-service teacher students in three Israeli and American universities on algorithmic, lower-order cognitive skills (LOCS), and conceptual chemistry exam questions was investigated. The driving force for the study was an interest in moving chemistry instruction from an algorithm-oriented factual recall approach dominated by LOCS to a decision-making, problem-solving, and critical thinking approach dominated by higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS). Students' responses to the specially designed algorithmic, LOCS, and conceptual exam questions were scored and analyzed for correlations and for differences between the means within and across universities by the question's category. The main findings were: (1) students in all three universities performed consistently on each of the three categories in the order of algorithmic > LOCS > conceptual questions, (2) success on algorithmic does not imply success on conceptual, or even on LOCS questions, and (3) students taught in small classes outperformed by far those in large lecture sessions in all three categories. The implied paradigm shift from an algorithmic/LOCS to a conceptual/HOCS orientation should be moved from a research-based theoretical domain to actual implementation in order for a meaningful improvement of chemistry teaching to occur.
|
|
| More Information |
 Citation |
Zoller, Uri; Lubezky, Aviva; Nakhleh, Mary B.; Tessier, Barbara; Dori, Yehudit J. J. Chem. Educ. 1995 72 987.
|
Keywords |
|
History |
Created:
Last Updated: |
10/1/1999
5/22/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues >
1995
>
November
> Page
987
|
|
|
| JCE HS CLIC |
|
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
|
| Contributions Welcome |
| JCE welcomes your submission |
| Advertisers |
| In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first. |
| Be An Ambassador |
| Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants. |
|
