This opinion paper poses questions for the chemical education community to consider about the nature of college chemistry courses and the expected student prerequisites. It also explores the basis for a potential mismatch that may exist for students enrolled in a traditional college chemistry course who have had Science-Technology-Society (STS) or ChemCom courses as their only prior high school chemistry courses. Even though ChemCom and STS courses are not designed to prepare students for traditional college chemistry courses for science and engineering majors, there has been an increase in the number of ChemCom and STS students enrolling in these courses. As background, the general teaching approach of ChemCom and STS courses is discussed in terms of the behaviorist, cognitive, and constructivist learning theories. This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of high school chemistry courses based on ChemCom and reviews the chemical education research comparing the effectiveness of ChemCom courses to traditional high school chemistry courses. The authors concluded that more research comparing the effect of these instructional methods on both traditional and alternative assessments is warranted.
More Information
Citation
Michael J. Sanger and Thomas J. Greenbowe. J. Chem. Educ.1996 73 532.
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.