I applaud the recent article by Jeffrey Kovac
(J. Chem. Educ.1996,73, 926) in which our attention is directed
towards the need for ethics in science and his efforts to
develop texts and materials for classroom use. It is
encouraging that articles discussing the inclusion of ethics in
the chemistry curriculum are appearing more frequently in
this Journal (e.g., J. Chem. Educ.
1996,73, 33). I do however, take issue with Kovac's use of "Scientific Ethics" in both
the title and the body of the article, which implies that
environmental, biomedical, and religious ethics are
nonscientific. Colleagues active in these areas publish scholarly
work that is genuinely "scientific". I would suggest using
"Science Ethics" or "Ethics for Scientists", since that is really
what the paper is about and is more inclusive language. My
concern is one of nomenclature which for chemists is of
great importance and does not lessen in any way the solid
foundations of Kovac's contribution.
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.