The use of the terms Dissociation and Ionization in the teaching of chemistry is discussed. It is suggested that the term dissociation, and what it suggests in terms of ordinary language, is inappropriate when used in certain contexts. Since an alternate and more physically correct term, specifically ionization, is available for these contexts, it is argued that this term be used consistently in these contexts. The contexts in which the term dissociation and dissociation constant cause problems is primarily in the area of ionization of weak and strong acids and of weak bases. The author surveys several textbooks as to their usage of the terms ionization and dissociation. It is pointed out that some textbooks use these terms inconsistently. For the sake of clarity and for congruity with the actual chemistry taking place, it is suggested that the term ionization and ionization constant be used exclusively in those contexts in which ions are formed from nonionic species. The term dissociation should be used only in the context of species breaking into their component parts; it should no longer be used to describe processes that are actually ionizations.
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.