|
The revolution in technology and information
processing that is engulfing the modern world is defining the
educational needs of the next generation. Future citizens
must learn to work and compete in a world of integrated
economies linked together by information technologies that
operate at incredible speeds. The signs of this coming New Age
of information and communication are everywhere.
Businesses are transforming their operations, governments are
adjusting to the changes, the financial systems of disparate
economies are more interdependent than most of us realize,
and not a few of us are discomfited by the pace of change.
There is general agreement that all educational
systems must adjust to the new realities in order to produce
informed citizens who can prosper and live with psychological
comfort in the 21st century. There is also a palpable malaise
among parents, school teachers, and university educators,
because many educational systems are not changing rapidly
enough to adjust to the new order. Particularly missing in the
backgrounds of vast numbers of students is a grounding in
science and mathematics, both prerequisite for capitalizing
on the opportunities of the next century and for functioning
effectively in it. There is also copious evidence that the
current cohort of teachers is not comfortable with science
and avoids teaching science because of ignorance, disinterest,
and lack of support from school authorities. Moreover, there is
a perception among scientists that the current university
curricula designed for new teachers lack features essential
for producing teachers who can inculcate science literacy in
their students. To date, however, little of this manifest concern
has been translated into action.
In the United States, few college students who
intend to teach in elementary schools (grades K8) major in a
science. What little science they do experience is usually
descriptive, such as elementary biology or a first course in
geology. The quantitative sciences, such as chemistry and
physics, are largely avoided. Once in the school system the
teacher must rely upon printed materials, in-service workshops,
and prescribed curricula, since without outside help the
teacher's knowledge is insufficient to enable him or her to
stimulate curiosity and excitement about the physical world in
young minds. Science becomes "bookish", utterly lacking in
vitality, and trivial. Feeling insecure and frustrated, the
teacher sometimes avoids teaching any science at all!
Preservice Programs for Elementary Teachers
To produce an elementary teacher who is prepared
for and enthusiastic about teaching science, a completely
new curriculum for teacher preparation must be designed.
This curriculum must integrate the rudiments of physics,
chemistry, biology, geology, and mathematics in a seamless
way that portrays the universality of science. The new
curriculum must also be an experiential one in which the
prospective teacher is constantly relating scientific principles to
the world about us. In biology this translates into activities
such as growing plants, monitoring the seasonal changes,
and field trips. For chemistry such a curriculum would
include simple experiments with consumer supplies and
chemicals, not only to keep the cost low but also to underscore the
ubiquity of chemistry in all our lives. During the study of both physics
and geology the aspiring teacher should come to see what Newton
saw, that the same laws that operate on Planet
Earth also dictate the trajectories of space capsules
and the motions of the heavens. Such a curriculum would
also include investigation of the planets, the stars, the depths
of the earth, the oceans, and the creatures that inhabit
the earth. Computers would be used to access the wealth of
information available for both teachers and students to
expand their horizons beyond a parochial view of science
to an appreciation of its universality and the power of the
scientific method.
The Role of the Scientist
The teaching of science to preservice elementary
teachers is far too important to allow it to be totally in the
hands of professional educators. Experts in curriculum design
are necessary. Those who teach "methods" are needed.
The content specialists, however, must include those who
practice science. The holistic approach to science and its methods
outlined above cannot be generated by specialists in
education, nor can it be forged by scientists acting in isolation. To
design a truly effective curriculum that will produce
scientifically literate teachers will require the concerted,
integrated, and cooperative interaction of exponents from education
and from all the disciplines of science. Moreover, these
experts must respect each other's knowledge and be ready to
sacrifice "coverage" of parts of their own disciplines in order
to make the whole greater than the sum of its parts.
This is a very tall order. Scientists are specialists.
They have succeeded by restricting their visions and
delving deeper into a single subject than those who have
preceded them. To educate teachers they must become
generalists and participate in an enterprise where cooperation
with specialists outside their immediate fields becomes the
norm. Difficult as this may be, it must be done if a curriculum
is to be forged that is commensurate with the demands of
educating a teacher for the 21st century.
Essential Elements of a New Science Curriculum
Although the essence of any program ultimately lies
in the details, certain global parameters that should define
the new curriculum for prospective elementary teachers are
becoming visible. The list below contains essential features
of the science component.
· sciences taught with interdisciplinary emphasis
· instruction by a combination of methods
· lectures, multimedia, computer simulation, group projects, self-study
· computers integrated with the teaching of science and mathematics
· note-taking, data acquisition, data reduction, graphing, computation, report writing
· laboratory instruction (traditional and open-ended investigations)
· individual and group projects
· student-designed experiments
· field trips, environmental monitoring, astronomical observations
· science knowledge of student constructed by inquiry, discussion, confirmation, and reflection
· use of both inductive and deductive methods
· focus on conceptual knowledge: acquisition, evaluation, application, communication
· emphasis on analysis and synthesis of knowledge
· assessment by multiple techniques
· examinations, project evaluations, portfolios, interviews, oral presentations, lab practica, written reports
Chemistry in the Elementary Curriculum
Since most of the phenomena children encounter in
the world around them conform to universal chemical laws,
the teaching of chemistry to prospective elementary
teachers should relate chemical principles to our daily activities.
The laboratory should use consumer materials and
supplies, for these are familiar to students. The acquisition of
chemical knowledge should occur in many activities ranging
from formal lab experiments at a desk to assaying the quality
of stream water. The prospective teachers should learn how
to employ simple household supplies to illustrate
phenomena, how to relate familiar processes to established scientific
principles. The teacher must also become comfortable with
applied science in its many forms; demonstrations are a
must. If the relevance of chemical principles to daily observed
phenomena does not become clear to a prospective teacher,
then that teacher will never be able to evoke from children
curiosity and wonder about the world around them.
Moreover, unless a prospective teacher traverses a curriculum
where the integration of the fields of science (chemistry with
biology, chemistry with physics, chemistry with geology,
physics with biology, etc.) and the universality of the
scientific method are clearly revealed, then that teacher will
always view science as disparate sets of unrelated facts that
relate neither to each other nor to the world around them. Such
a teacher will never be able to show children how to enjoy
science nor be able to elevate them to an acceptable level of
science literacy to prepare them for secondary school.
A Small Beginning
Although a new integrated course of study for
prospective elementary teachers is the only permanent solution
to the problem of scientifically uneducated elementary
teachers, there are some small steps that chemistry
departments could take to improve the lot of these neglected individuals.
· modify courses such as "Chemistry for Nurses and
the Health Sciences" to include special laboratory
sections designed for elementary education majors
· team-teach science methods courses with colleagues in the School of Education
· collaborate with physicists to offer an interdisciplinary sequence in the physical sciences that includes interesting and enjoyable laboratory investigations
· join the geologists to offer an interesting interdisciplinary sequence on the chemistry and geology of the Earth
Conclusion
A revolution in the teaching of science to
elementary students is badly needed. Before that revolution can
occur in the self-contained classroom of the school, however, a
new type of teacher will be required, a teacher schooled in
the basic ideas of all the sciences, a teacher capable of
relating the principles and laws of science to the world of the
student, and a teacher comfortable with science as a body
of knowledge and a way of knowing. Designing the new
curriculum and implementing it in the universities cannot
be accomplished by professional educators alone. To
tackle such a formidable task practicing scientists must be
involved. The central question is: Will the university
scientists accept the challenge?
Note
1. Adapted from an address presented at the Third
Venezuelan Congress of Chemistry, Caracas, Venezuela, 1014
November 1996.
|