|
Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1997. xxxvi + 747 pp.
This volume is part of the Higher and Adult
Education Series of Jossey-Bass Publishers and the Association
of American Colleges and Universities. Its purpose is to
provide an overview of the debates and reforms concerning
the undergraduate curriculum. As to what is the
curriculum, Clark Kerr is quoted, "the curriculum isthe
statement a college makes about what is considered useful,
appropriate, or relevant" Thus the term curriculum refers
to the educational plan of an institution or to a program
or course. The major thesis of this volume is that the trend
of fragmentation of the learning experience of students is
currently being reversed and the needed innovation and
experimentation cannot be carried out without sound
assessment of student growth, development, and attainment.
The book consists of six parts. Part One deals with
the purposes and objectives of undergraduate education;
Part Two focuses on general education; Part Three looks at
specialized features of the curriculum; Part Four addresses
the question of innovations; Part Five deals with
institutional support; and Part Six looks ahead to the curriculum of
the next century.
The majority of the 57 contributing authors have
a background outside the sciences and math: 20 in
education, 9 in English, 6 in psychology, 5 in social sciences, 4 in
history and music. German, economics, political science,
and French backgrounds are also present. At the other end
of the spectrum, there are 4 with a background in biology, 1
in math, and 1 in chemistry.
This is not the book to rush to when a change in
the curriculum needs to be introduced in chemistry
education. Rather, it provides a broad-based background with
history and principles, with the evolution of the curriculum,
and ample references of the sources. The section on the
Antecedents of American Higher Education is especially
illuminating and at places amusing. It starts with
Pythagoras teaching philosophy between 532 and 500 B.C.E. We
also learn that in 460 it was introduced in Rome that
lawyers had to pass an examination in law before they could
practice in courts. When, in 1266, Roger Bacon introduced
innovations in the curriculum, including the study of
modern languages, he was jailed for twelve years for
departures from tradition; a stern warning of the dangers for
curricular innovators. This historic section deals almost
exclusively with European experience. Yet elsewhere in the book
the need is mentioned for more inclusive curriculum reflecting
the multicultural nature of contemporary American
society, including women's studies, Black studies, Asian studies,
and other perspectives.
Properly sequencing the curriculum is especially
important for math and science learning. Whereas the
majority of courses in the humanities and social sciences can
be visualized as having a horizontal relationship, math and
the sciences build on each other. Concepts such as cross
section and modularity may be helpful in teaching the sciences,
and are not covered in the discussion. Rather, there is an
inventory of experiences with a variety of subjects at
various schools. The whole chapter (Chapter 13) devoted to
the natural sciences and mathematics is slim, a mere 21
pages, including one page on innovative efforts in chemistry.
From my own experience teaching introductory chemistry in
four U.S. universities, some preparations in English and
geometry would be very useful for more efficient learning of
general chemistry. This may seem to be too provocative a
suggestion, but it is the kind of general discussion of the
undergraduate curriculum where such cross-disciplinary
questions could be raised. Despite its terseness and
shortcomings, the authors of Chapter 13, chemist Gene G.
Wubbels and psychologist Joan S. Girgus, did an excellent job
and their discussion culminates in quoting Michael Polanyi
and his Personal Knowledge (Chicago University Press, 1958)
to stress the role of the individual both in providing
knowledge and in learning. Polanyi's ideas may serve as a
guiding light for those who would like to improve the
curriculum of mathematics and the sciences.
This Handbook is of lasting value for all involved
in education, and in particular for those who in any way
have a say in shaping the curriculum of undergraduate
education.
|