JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 1997  > November  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
Letter to the Editor about "How Do I Balance Thee?... Let Me Count the Ways!" by Lawrence A. Ferguson (J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 1129)
Wade A. Freeman, Ngoh-Khang Goh, L. S. Chia, David M. Hart, Eric A. Lucas, David J. Perry, R. Subramaniam, Marten J. ten Hoor, Sidney Toby, and Richard S. Treptow

Cover
November 1997
Vol. 74 No. 11
p. 1256

Full Text
We read with interest "How Do I Balance Thee?...Let Me Count the Ways!" (J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 1129). The author points out an interesting dilemma in balancing equations, namely, situations in which the number of variables (in this case, the number of coefficients of the species involved) is more than the number of independent constraints (in most cases, the number of elements to be balanced) plus one. This situation has been described previously in this Journal (1991, 68, 984; 1994, 71, 490; 1995, 72, 894). It results in an infinite number of algebraically balanced equations, each of which is a combination of two equations. One such pair of equations is

4HCl + ClO2 -> 2H2O + 2.5Cl2

2KClO3 + 1.5Cl2 -> 2KCl + 3ClO2

Ferguson correctly points out that the number of degrees of freedom in choosing a balanced equation for this system is two, and that one way to choose these degrees of freedom is to set the coefficients of KClO3 and ClO2. From these, all other coefficients are uniquely determined.

[Note: There were two misprints in the table of coefficients in Ferguson's paper. Line 3 should have coefficients 4, 16, 4, 8, 7, 2 and line 5 should have 5, 22, 5, 11, 10, 2.]

However, in his final paragraph, he goes one step too far and incorrectly implies that only one of the equations obtained in this way is actually correct, and that the others can somehow be "negated". The fact is that all of the equations that he presents are correctly balanced, and that none can be negated on this basis. He suggests that there is a constraint beyond the balancing of atomsthat is, the balancing of the transfer of electrons. However, if charge is balanced (it is in all these cases), and if each of the atom types in the equation is correctly balanced (they are), then the number of electrons in the equation is trivially balanced.

Based on the mathematics of equation balancing, none of these equations is more correct than any of the others. There is frequently more than one correct answer to any given question, and often new insights into a problem come from the "unconventional" answer. To answer the question of what ratios of reactant and product masses are actually obtained requires experimental data that are not part of the algebraic equation-balancing theory.

More Information
*  Citation
Freeman, Wade A.; Goh, Nhoh-Knang; Chia, L. S.; Hart, David M.; Lucas, Eric A.; Perry, David J.; Subramaniam, R.; ten Hoor, Marten J.; Toby , Sidney; Treptow, Richard S. J. Chem. Educ. 1997 74 1256.
*  Keywords
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
July 27, 1999
June 23, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 1997  > November


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.