Many undergraduate college students view the traditional topics of general and analytical chemistry with trepidation and consider them boring and irrelevant to their future careers. While a number of remedial efforts have been made to increase relevancy and interest potential, an area that has not been extensively explored is the incorporation of topics relating to "bad science" into lecture and laboratory curricula. This paper presents examples of bad science ranging from "unintentional mistakes" to "fraud" that can be used as part of traditional courses in general and analytical chemistry to encourage scientific reasoning and ethical behavior, and to provide a classroom atmosphere that encourages students to think and learn.
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.