JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print
   Current Issue
 Previous Issues
 Supplements
 Search JCE Index

JCE Digital Library
   DigiDemos
 QBank
 SymMath
 WebWare

JCE Software
   Latest Releases
 Software & Video
 Downloads
 Support

Only@JCE Online
   JCE Online Store
 JCE HS CLIC
 JCE Discussion Forums
   Biographical Snapshots
 ChemEd Resource Shelf
 Featured Molecules
 Hal's Picks
 Project Chemlab
 Reviewed WWW Sites
 "Web-Ed" Articles

About JCE
   Features
 Publications
 Operations
 Outreach
 Contact Us


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2001  > March  >
Research: Science and Education
Electronegativity and Bond Type: Predicting Bond Type
Gordon Sproul
Department of Chemistry, University of South Carolina at Beaufort, Beaufort, SC 29902
Cover
March 2001
Vol. 78 No. 3
p. 387
Abstract
While most general chemistry textbooks recognize that differences in electronegativity between bonded atoms provide only an indication of bond type, the difference function of electronegativity itself is both inadequate and improper for determining bond type. An alternative algorithm based on the unfunctionalized values of electronegativity for the two bonded atoms in binary compounds of representative elements provides much better discrimination between ionic and covalent bonding. This algorithm not only removes the ambiguity introduced by the difference function, but at the same time provides for the natural inclusion of the third type of interatomic bond--metal-metal bonding. Textbook authors should indicate that the absolute values of electronegativity, not their differences, are most useful for predicting bond type. Also, the value of electronegativity of the element of higher electronegativity in binary compounds determines whether the compound will be metallic. If a compound is not metallic, the electronegativity of the element of lower electronegativity determines whether the compound will exhibit primarily ionic or covalent character if that element is representative. If the element of lower electronegativity is a transition metal, the bond character is not predictable using electronegativities alone.
Supplement
Supplemental material for this article is available.
*  Contents JCE2001p387W.doc (MS Word)
*  Download
JCE2001p0387W.pdf

JCE2001p0387W.zip

JCE2001p0387W.sit
More Information
*  Citation
 Sproul, Gordon. J. Chem. Educ. 2001 78 387.
*  Keywords
 Bonding Theory; General Chemistry; Inorganic Chemistry; Materials Science; Periodicity / Periodic Table; Teaching / Learning Aids
*  History
 Created:
Last Updated:		 February 6, 2001
August 31, 2005
<< Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article >>
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2001  > March  > Page 387


Subscriptions
 Subscription Info
 Order Forms

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
 JCE HS CLIC

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission
 Contributors' Corner

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
 Recent Advertisers

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.
 Outreach with JCE

Comments to
jceonline@chem.wisc.edu		 Copyright © Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society.
All rights reserved.