JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2002  > January  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
pH of Sodium Acetate Solutions
Guy Schmitz
Faculté de Sciences Appliquées, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium

Cover
January 2002
Vol. 79 No. 1
p. 29

Full Text

Several papers published in this Journal (1) present the buffering effect in a pedagogical way. However, an experimental aspect deserves to be emphasized. Our first-year students measure the pH of acetate buffer solutions and compare them with the calculated values. They also compare the measured and calculated pH of 0.1 M acetic acid and sodium acetate. The agreement is good in all cases except one: the measured pH of the sodium acetate solution is always lower than the calculated value. We found that the explanation of this discrepancy is an excellent illustration of buffering power. The measured pH of CH3COONa is too low because of the dissolution of CO2. This can be shown theoretically and experimentally.

As the CH3COONa solution is basic, we consider the following equilibria to calculate its pH. The second dissociation of carbonic acid can be neglected.

CH3COO- + H2O double reaction arrow CH3COOH + OH-

CO2·H2O + OH- double reaction arrow HCO3- + H2O

This gives

eqn 1

and

eqn 2

Neglecting [H+], the mass balance equations give

[CH3COO-] + [CH3COOH] = 0.1

[CH3COOH] = [OH-] + [HCO3-]

Without carbonic acid we get [CH3COOH] = [OH-] and [CH3COO-] = 0.1; then [OH-]2 = 0.1 x 10-9.24 and pH = 8.9. In aqueous solutions in equilibrium with air containing 350 ppm of CO2, the dissolved CO2 concentration is approximately [CO2·H2O] = 10-5 mol/L. Solving the above equations, we get [HCO3-] = 102.6[OH-] and [CH3COOH] = 4 x 102[OH-]; then 4 x 102[OH-]2 = 0.1 x10-9.24 and pH = 7.6. This is very close to the value obtained by the students. The CO2 dissolution decreases the pH of the sodium acetate solution by more than one unit. An experimental proof of this effect can be given. When pure N2 is bubbled through the solution, the pH increases. However, this increase is very slow. Even with high N2 flow and vigorous stirring, we only got pH = 8.4 after two hours. An additional proof can be given. If we stop the N2 flow and leave the stirred solution in contact with air, we see that the pH decreases slowly.

The students are surprised to see that a small quantity of CO2 can so greatly affect the pH of the sodium acetate solution but has no effect on the pH of its mixtures with acetic acid. This unexpected observation gives them a more striking illustration of the buffering effect than the classical addition of a small quantity of dilute HCl.

Literature Cited

  1. Urbansky, E. T., Schock, M. R. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 1640; Gould, E. S. 1999, 76, 1511; Barnum, D. 1999, 76, 938; Ramette, R. W. 1998, 75, 1504; Chiriac, V.; Balea, G. 1997, 74, 937.
More Information
*  Citation
Schmitz, Guy. J. Chem. Educ. 2002 79 29.
*  Keywords
Acid-Base Chemistry; Teaching / Learning Aids
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
December 3, 2001
March 16, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2002  > January  > Page 29


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.