|
|
| Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues >
2002
>
June
> |
|
Research: Science and Education
|
|
Chemical Education Research
|
|
Following the Development of the Bonding Concept Using Knowledge Space Theory
|
Mare Taagepera, Ramesh Arasasingham, Frank Potter, Arash Soroudi, and Giang Lam
Department of Chemistry, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2025
|
|
June 2002
Vol. 79 No. 6
p. 756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract |
|
Students are introduced to the bonding concept in high school chemistry; the concept is reintroduced in general chemistry and again in organic chemistry. How does the student's level of understanding develop through the numerous chemistry courses? The bonding concept contains some of the characteristics of difficult concepts: it involves a theoretical model requiring that students interpret observations that cannot be experienced directly, and it assumes that students can make logical inferences. From the results of 2395 tests from 993 students in general and organic chemistry we analyzed the simple percentage of correct answers and the most often occurring incorrect answers. The connectivity of these responses, or the students' cognitive organization of the material, was followed by the use of knowledge space theory (KST). Electron density distribution was the organizing theme. This research indicates that not only do we need more time for making the connections, we also need more time to teach the factual material of a fundamental aspect of chemistry—bonding. The students' knowledge is superficial and does not seem to be transferable. The KST analysis itself can be used as a remedy, since it helps us to assess the flaws in the students' cognitive organization of information. This enables us to teach with greater insight, which includes going back to the basic principles of bonding with special emphasis on visualizing molecular phenomena at the microscopic level.
|
|
| More Information |
 Citation |
Taagepera, Mare; Arasasingham, Ramesh; Potter, Frank; Soroudi, Arash; Lam, Giang. J. Chem. Educ. 2002 79 756.
|
Keywords |
CER Constructivism; CER Learning Theories; CER Misconceptions; Chemical Education Research
|
History |
Created:
Last Updated: |
May 17, 2002
March 16, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues >
2002
>
June
> Page
756
|
|
|
| JCE HS CLIC |
|
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
|
| Contributions Welcome |
| JCE welcomes your submission |
| Advertisers |
| In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first. |
| Be An Ambassador |
| Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants. |
|
