JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2003  > February  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
"Disorder" in Unstretched Rubber Bands?
Frank L. Lambert
Occidental College, La Verne, CA 91750

Cover
February 2003
Vol. 80 No. 2
p. 145

Full Text
In the February 2002 issue of the Journal, Warren Hirsch described the classic rubber band experiment and its oft-used thermodynamic implications in JCE Classroom Activity #42 (1). It is an amusing coincidence, but perhaps confusing to many, that my article showing “disorder” to be a misleading concept happened to appear in the same issue (2). Explication of the behavior of a rubber band has long been thought to be a prime example of the value of “disorder”!

However, when “disorder” is discarded, the rubber band experiment can be more fundamentally understood. First, energy spreading out in molecular motion is what entropy measures. The more such dispersal of energy occurs or can occur (as a function of temperature), the greater the entropy (3). Second, the process of stretching a rubber band (and its retraction) involves two modes of energy spreading out (4).

The major way in which energy is spread out in the long twisted molecules in rubber is in the rotating portions of the molecules or in equally fast bending of the links per molecule. This is favored in the conformations of unstretched rubber where parts of the molecules are relatively free to move, as in a liquid. Therefore in the unstretched rubber, energy is much spread out—as is indicated by its high entropy. In contrast, when a rubber band is pulled, its enormous number of lengthy molecules are stretched out and there is less opportunity for free rotation or bending in these conformations. There are fewer ways for energy to be distributed among the molecules and thus a stretched band has lower entropy than one unstretched. When the tension on the band is released, because its energy can be more spread out in the unstretched form, the band spontaneously snaps to that form and its entropy increases.

The thermal effects fit well with the foregoing description of molecular behavior. A rubber band when stretched becomes warm from the work of stretching it plus the energy that can no longer be spread out in the more mobile molecular conformations of the unstretched rubber. After reaching room temperature, the stretched band has much less entropy than the unstretched band. When the band is rapidly released, it becomes cool because energy is spread out from the vibrational to the now-available conformational modes of motion and the temperature drops. Eventually, energy from the surroundings is spread out within the band to bring its temperature to ambient.

It is probably best in most classes to emphasize only the predominant path of energy dispersal: more ways to spread out in the more freely rotating segments of the molecules in the unstretched rubber (higher entropy), fewer ways in the less freely moving portions in stretched rubber (lower entropy).

The minor pathway of energy dispersal involves weak bond formation or breaking (van der Waals interaction between molecules or parts) that are analogous to phase change from a “liquid” unstretched rubber (5) to a “solid” stretched rubber band. When the band is stretched, the warmth is due to the work done plus the energy released analogous to a true liquid changing to a solid. (A liquid has more ways of spreading energy among its freely rotating molecules than in the more restricted molecular movement in a solid.) Conversely, when the “solid” stretched band is released, it cools because energy must be transferred from the surroundings to be spread out in the increased number of rotations and movement in the “liquid” unstretched rubber.

The “disordered” sketch, atop page 200B (right) in Activity #42 (1), actually represents a liquid polymer because of the presence of relatively free rotating and bending of the many links in unstretched poly(isoprene) (5), a state characterized by increased entropy compared to the solid form shown (in a too precise pattern) at its left.

(Note that it is not correct to apply the Gibbs equation where the pressure on the system is difficult to define; the ΔA = ΔU – TΔS of Helmholtz is proper because the volume is essentially constant) (4).

Literature Cited

  1. Hirsch, W. J. Chem. Educ. 2002, 79, 200A–200B.
  2. Lambert, F. L. J. Chem. Educ. 2002, 79, 187–192.
  3. Lambert, F. L. J. Chem. Educ. 2002, 79, 1241–1246.
  4. Byrne, J. P. J. Chem. Educ. 1994, 71, 531–533.
  5. Nash, L. K. J. Chem. Educ. 1979, 56, 363–368.

See the author's reply.

More Information
*  Citation
Lambert, Frank L. J. Chem. Educ. 2003 80 145.
*  Keywords
General Chemistry; Intermolecular Forces; Introductory / High School Chemistry; Physical Chemistry; Polymer Chemistry; Teaching / Learning Aids; Thermodynamics
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
January 6, 2003
April 11, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2003  > February  > Page 145


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.