If change in science education is to occur in this country, it cannot be merely a K–12 issue. This paper offers the reader the opportunity to hear from students about the beliefs they hold, based in large part on their experiences in science classrooms at the college level. Constructivism makes clear the key role prior conceptions play in the process of learning. As instructors of methods courses, the authors were interested in the conceptions about teaching and learning of science majors who wished to become high school teachers. These conceptions have much to do with efforts nationwide to improve the science education of Americans. Data were collected from 1990–2000 and the results are reported in the form of assertions that describe four major categories of beliefs. In general, these students value content over pedagogy, believe that good teachers are entertaining, believe that laboratories are important in science teaching although they are not sure why, and believe that methods courses are a waste of time for a variety of reasons. The results of this study indicate that college science instructors can have a profound impact on reforming K–12 science education practice, but they must first take some bold steps to change their practice in the classroom.
More Information
Citation
Phelps, Amy J.; Lee, Cherin. J. Chem. Educ.2003 80 829.
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.