JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2004  > January  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
The "Dissing" of Niels Bohr
Andrew R. Peterson
Sunland, CA 91040

Cover
January 2004
Vol. 81 No. 1
p. 33

Full Text
In high school, students speak of being “dissed”, which can mean dismissed and discounted. In modern textbooks on general chemistry, for example (1), the contributions of Niels Bohr, except for his model of the hydrogen atom, have been discounted, and even the model is dismissed as being of value only for one electron species.

By contrast, Sidgwick gave Bohr credit for recognizing in Thomsen’s periodic table the fruitful placing of the transition elements so that “a stable group has the form 2n2(2). This contribution and Bohr’s authorship of the Aufbauprinzip (3) is not made clear in modern texts.

Bohr arrived at his explanation of the Periodic Law by means of his correspondence principle (4). However, this principle cannot be employed in calculations (5). Accordingly, I believe, modern introductory texts only use quantum mechanics to explain energy sublevels.

The idea of energy sublevels came from Bohr and Sommerfeld in response to the spectral line splitting observed by Zeeman and Stark (4). So, in an introductory chemistry course, I prefer to explain these sublevels by using Bohr’s approach rather than by detailing the “mathematical theory of quantum mechanics (which) is not suited to study by the beginning student” (6). Others too have found that “The old quantum theory of Bohr and Sommerfeld is still very useful from the didactic standpoint” (7).

For an introductory course, I believe that before discussing quantum mechanics, the derivation of the Bohr theory of the hydrogen atom can be followed by presentation of the Stark and Zeeman results, which are available on the Internet (4). The students can then be guided to come up with their own correspondence principle leading, as it led Bohr, to the Aufbauprinzip.

Literature Cited

  1. Chang, R. Chemistry, 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2002; pp 252–273.
  2. Sidgwick, N. V. The Electronic Theory of Valence; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1927; pp 29, 41.
  3. Bohr, N. The Theory of Spectra and Atomic Constitution; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1922; pp 62–126.
  4. Bohr, N. The Structure of the Atom (accessed Oct 2003).
  5. Kragh, H, In Niels Bohr; French, A. P.; Kennedy, P. J. Eds.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1985; pp 50–67.
  6. Pauling, L. College Chemistry, 3rd ed.; W. H. Freeman: San Francisco, 1964; p 197.
  7. Persico, E. Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics; Temmer, G. M. Ed.; Prentice Hall: New York, 1950, p vi.
More Information
*  Citation
Peterson, Andrew R. J. Chem. Educ. 2004 81 33.
*  Keywords
History / Philosophy; Introductory / High School Chemistry; Molecular Modeling / Dynamics
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
December 8, 2003
February 18, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2004  > January  > Page 33


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.