JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2004  > July  >
In the Classroom
Moving Beyond the Single Center—Ways To Reinforce Molecular Orbital Theory in an Inorganic Course
Marion E. Cass and William E. Hollingsworth
Department of Chemistry, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057

Cover
July 2004
Vol. 81 No. 7
p. 997

Abstract
Rather than ending the discussion of molecular orbital (MO) theory in an inorganic chemistry course with molecules such as octahedral ML6 or square planar ML4, we suggest moving beyond the single-atom center to include the MO diagram of ethene (C2H4). Embracing the use of group theory and symmetry adapted linear combinations (SALCs) at the level already taught, we extend the coverage to include this simple organic dimer as a means of teaching skills that enable students to tackle significantly more complicated molecules. Ethene provides a bridge to the fragment approach pioneered by Roald Hoffmann and used in some high-level treatises. Larger molecules are split into component fragments poised to form bonds. The MO diagram is constructed for each fragment and then combined to obtain the MO diagram of the full molecule. In this way, more sophisticated examples can be addressed if the process is reduced to smaller, more chemically intuitive steps. To bring the fragment approach to the undergraduate curriculum, we present the MO diagram of C2H4 first using SALCs of atomic orbitals and then contrasting this with a two-step fragment approach that first creates the MO diagram of the CH2 diradical.
Supplement
The following are available:
  1. Notes on Selected Texts and References for Teaching MO Theory
  2. Symmetry Analysis for H2O (to Create SALCs and Assign Symmetry Labels for Atomic Orbitals that will be used in Bonding)
  3. Mixing Among the A1 Orbitals of H2O: Differing Points of View
  4. A Comparison of the Energies of the MOs of Water Calculated with Our Molecular Modeling Program (Under Different Basis Sets) versus Those Determined from Photoelectron Data
  5. Class Assignment Comparing the Similarities and Differences Among Seven Selected MO Diagrams for Water
  6. Atomic Orbital Energies for the First 18 Elements
  7. Spartan Output from the MO Calculation on CH2
  8. Symmetry Analysis for C2H4 using a SALC Approach
  9. Symmetry Analysis of C2H4 MOs using a Fragment Approach

*  Contents JCE2004p0997W.doc (Microsoft Word)
*  Download
JCE2004p0997W.pdf

JCE2004p0997W.zip

JCE2004p0997W.sit

More Information
*  Citation
Cass, Marion E.; Hollingsworth, William E. J. Chem. Educ. 2004 81 997.
*  Keywords
Bonding Theory; Inorganic Chemistry; MO Theory; Molecular Modeling / Dynamics
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
May 27, 2004
January 19, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2004  > July  > Page 997


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.