JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print
   Current Issue
 Previous Issues
 Supplements
 Search JCE Index

JCE Digital Library
   DigiDemos
 QBank
 SymMath
 WebWare

JCE Software
   Latest Releases
 Software & Video
 Downloads
 Support

Only@JCE Online
   JCE Online Store
 JCE HS CLIC
 JCE Discussion Forums
   Biographical Snapshots
 ChemEd Resource Shelf
 Featured Molecules
 Hal's Picks
 Project Chemlab
 Reviewed WWW Sites
 "Web-Ed" Articles

About JCE
   Features
 Publications
 Operations
 Outreach
 Contact Us


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2005  > August  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
Understanding Attrition in an Introductory Chemistry Sequence Following Successful Completion of a Remedial Course
Kathy B. Jones and Gregory I. Gellene
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-1061
Cover
August 2005
Vol. 82 No. 8
p. 1241
Abstract
This paper discusses the results of a survey conducted to ascertain the causes of attrition among 819 students who had successfully completed a remedial chemistry course over the previous three years with a grade of A, B, or C, yet had not enrolled in the subsequent chemistry course at Texas Tech University. Approximately 22% of the recipients completed and returned the survey instrument. The distribution of responses was largely independent of the type of instructor (temporary or permanent faculty), the academic year the remedial course was taken, or the grade received. Approximately one-third of the respondents attributed their (apparent) attrition to one of three non-curriculum related causes: inaccurate advising to take the remedial course (4.8%), withdrawl from the university (11.9%), or enrollment for the next course in the chemistry sequence at another university (16.1%). Consistently, the most frequent response was that subsequent to taking the remedial chemistry course the respondent either chose or changed to a major that did not require chemistry (53.3%). However, only about 17% of these respondents (or about 9% of the respondents overall) indicated that their decision was influenced by an unfavorable experience in the remedial course. The implications of these findings for the value and effectiveness of a remedial chemistry course is discussed.
More Information
*  Citation
 Jones, Kathy B.; Gellene, Gregory I. J. Chem. Educ. 2005 82 1241.
*  Keywords
 Chemical Education Research; Curriculum; First-Year Undergraduate / General
*  History
 Created:
Last Updated:		 July 5, 2005
July 8, 2005
<< Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article >>
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2005 > August > Page 1241


Subscriptions
 Subscription Info
 Order Forms

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
 JCE HS CLIC

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission
 Contributors' Corner

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
 Recent Advertisers

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.
 Outreach with JCE

Comments to
jceonline@chem.wisc.edu		 Copyright © Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society.
All rights reserved.