The ability to use the curved-arrow or electron-pushing formalism is one of the most vital skills in the organic chemist's repertoire. Their introduction to this formalism occurs when they first encounter reaction mechanisms. As they gain experience, the arrow-pushing formalism eventually becomes the primary technique organic chemists use to do retrosynthetic analysis, to predict the chemoselectivity of a reaction, and to create novel methodologies. Because practicing organic chemists use the arrow-pushing formalism in situations that are far removed from the simple contexts in which they are first presented, this study probed how students enrolled in a first-semester, graduate-level organic chemistry course approached the task of writing the mechanisms for two- to four-step reactions that lacked the typical cues that bring common mechanisms to mind. This article focuses on the students' solutions and discusses possible limitations of their strategies.
More Information
Citation
Bhattacharyya, Gautam; Bodner, George M. J. Chem. Educ.2005 82 1402.
Keywords
Chemical Education Research; Constructivism; Graduate Education / Research; Learning Theories; Mechanisms of Reactions; Organic Chemistry; Problem Solving / Decision Making; Second-Year Undergraduate
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.