JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2006  > March  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
Comparing the Effectiveness on Student Achievement of a Student Response System versus Online WebCT Quizzes
Diane M. Bunce, Jessica R. VandenPlas, Katherine L. Havanki
Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064
Cover
March 2006
Vol. 83 No. 3
p. 488

Abstract
This paper compares the effectiveness of an electronic student response system (SRS) to deliver ConcepTests with the use of WebCT quizzes for nursing students enrolled in general chemistry, organic chemistry, and biochemistry courses. SRS is a Web-based system designed to assist instructors in delivering and analyzing student responses to questions used in lecture and recitation. Student responses are captured and summarized graphically, providing students and instructors with immediate feedback. WebCT quizzes provide students with another opportunity for practice of the concepts presented in class. Student achievement after experience with either or both SRS and WebCT quizzes on teacher-written hour-long exams and an American Chemical Society final exam was investigated. Results show that small differences in teacher implementation of both of these innovations can have large effects on student achievement. As currently implemented, SRS did not provide opportunities for reflection and review, while WebCT did. Using SRS demonstrated no effect on student achievement measured by teacher-written exams; a minimal effect of using SRS on student achievement measured by the ACS exam was shown. WebCT quizzes resulted in statistically higher achievement on teacher-written hour-long tests, but not on the ACS exam. This was probably a result of the WebCT quizzes not being reviewed by students because of time constraints. Student survey answers were used to corroborate this interpretation.
Supplement
The text of the online student attitudinal survey and the written student course evaluation are available.
*  Contents JCE2006p0488W.doc (Microsoft Word)
*  Download
JCE2006p0488W.pdf

JCE2006p0488W.zip

More Information
*  Citation
Bunce, Diane M.; VandenPlas, Jessica; Havanki, Katherine. J. Chem. Educ. 2006 83 488.
*  Keywords
Chemical Education Research; Computer-Based Learning; Constructivism; Enrichment / Review Materials; Student-Centered Learning
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
1/31/2006
2/9/2006
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2006  > March  > Page 488


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.