JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print
   Current Issue
 Previous Issues
 Supplements
 Search JCE Index

JCE Digital Library
   ChemInfo
 DigiDemos
 Featured Molecules
 LivTexts
 LrnCom
 QBank
 SymMath
 WebWare

JCE Software
   Latest Releases
 Software & Video
 Downloads
 Support

Only@JCE Online
   JCE Online Store
 JCE HS CLIC
 JCE Discussion Forums
   Biographical Snapshots
 ChemEd Resource Shelf
 Featured Molecules
 Hal's Picks
 Project Chemlab
 Reviewed WWW Sites
 "Web-Ed" Articles

About JCE
   Features
 Publications
 Operations
 Outreach
 Contact Us


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2006  > May  >
In the Classroom
JCE DigiDemos: Tested Demonstrations
pH Paradoxes: Demonstrating That It Is Not True That pH ≡ -log[H+]
Christopher G. McCarty and Ed Vitz
Department of Chemistry, Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA 19530-0730

checked by James H. Maynard
Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706

Cover
May 2006
Vol. 83 No. 5
p. 752
Abstract
Six demonstrations highlighting paradoxes that arise if pH is incorrectly defined as -log[H+] are presented as justification for the recommendation that pH should be correctly defined as pH = -log aH+ in textbooks. For example, when acid with pH ~1 is diluted with an equal volume of 5 M MgCl2, one would expect the pH calculated as -log[H+] to increase as the concentration of acid is halved; surprisingly, it decreases to values below zero, as demonstrated with a pH meter or methyl green indicator. If a sample of the acid at pH ~2, and a second sample, diluted with salt solution so that it has pH ~0.5 are titrated with NaOH solution, equal volumes of base solution are required; but [H+] = antilog(-pH) is 0.01 in the first case and 0.32 in the second, leading to predictions of much different volumes of titrant. We could tolerate an approach to pH calculations that sacrificed reasonable practical answers for a sound theoretical foundation, but our current pedagogy seems to provide neither!
More Information
*  Citation
 McCarty, Christopher G.; Vitz, Ed. J. Chem. Educ. 2006 83 752.
*  Keywords
 Acids / Bases; Analytical Chemistry; Aqueous Solution Chemistry; Demonstrations; First-Year Undergraduate / General; Ion Selective Electrodes; pH; Physical Chemistry; Quantitative Analysis; Second-Year Undergraduate; Textbooks / Reference Books; Upper-Division Undergraduate
*  History
 Created:
Last Updated:		 3/16/2006
3/22/2006
<< Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article >>
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2006 > May > Page 752


Subscriptions
 Subscription Info
 Order Forms

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
 JCE HS CLIC

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission
 Contributors' Corner

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
 Recent Advertisers

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.
 Outreach with JCE

Comments to
jceonline@chem.wisc.edu		 Copyright © Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society.
All rights reserved.