JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > July  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
Markovnikov's Rule
Robert C. Kerber
Chemistry Department, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Long Island, NY 11794-3400
Cover
July 2007
Vol. 84 No. 7
p. 1109

Full Text
The recent contribution by Ilich, Rickertsen, and Becker (1) provides abundant reasons for abandoning the description of addition reactions and their products as “Markovniknov” or (even worse) “anti-Markovnikov”. In a recent review (2) I have surveyed the history of this usage and concluded that its use in teaching has long outlived its utility. The deeper understanding of these reactions as involving appropriate reactive intermediates (e.g., carbocations), whose relative stabilities can be understood on a general basis, should have superseded the use of an empirical rule that is often inapplicable, often restated in ways unrecognizable to its originator, and never an adequate substitute for understanding. If we wish students to understand organic reactivity as a whole, we should not provide them with this cognitive crutch. If our use of the description of one product as a “Markovnikov product” is meant to honor a great 19th century chemist, what is the effect of describing another as an “anti-Markovnikov product”? Unfortunately, the authors of the article draw back from the simple conclusion that the rule should be abandoned, but rather attempt once again to restate or reformulate it, while clinging to the name. In agreement with Gooch (3), I urge teachers and textbook authors to move past Markovnikov’s rule once and for all.

Literature Cited

  1. Ilich, P.-P.; Rickertsen, L. S.; Becker, E. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 1681–1685.
  2. Kerber, R. Foundations of Chemistry 2002, 4, 61–72.
  3. Gooch, E. E. J. Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 1358–1359.
See the author's reply.
More Information
*
Citation
Kerber, Robert C. . J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 1109.
*
Keywords
Addition Reactions; Misconceptions / Discrepant Events; Organic Chemistry; Reactions; Second-Year Undergraduate
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
5/29/2007
6/7/2007
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > July  > Page 1109


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.