JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2008  > June  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: A Cognitive Difference
Mark S. Cracolice
Department of Chemistry, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812

John C. Deming
Department of Chemistry, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987

Brian Ehlert
Portland Lutheran High School, Portland, OR 97233

Cover
June 2008
Vol. 85 No. 6
p. 873

Abstract
An initial sample of 94 students enrolled in a first-term general chemistry course was tested with paired algorithmic–conceptual questions, which included questions first used by Nurrenbern and Pickering. The topics of these questions were density, stoichiometry, gas laws, and molarity. Scientific reasoning skill was measured with the Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning. The skills assessed by this instrument are conservation of weight, conservation of displaced volume, proportional thinking, identification and control of variables, probabilistic thinking, correlational thinking, and hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Results showed that success on algorithmic questions was always higher than on conceptual questions, verifying the results of previous studies. Additionally, the students with better reasoning ability outperformed students with poorer reasoning ability on all question types, and the scores of the better reasoners were significantly higher than those of the poorer reasoners on three of the four conceptual questions administered, as well as on the ACS final examination. The results indicate that variation in scientific reasoning skills is one cause of the gap between algorithmic and conceptual problem-solving ability.
Supplement
Set of algorithmic–conceptual question pairs used in this study on general chemistry topics of density, stoichiometry, gas laws, and molarity
*
Download
Contents
More Information
*
Citation
Cracolice, Mark S.; Deming, John C.; Ehlert, Brian. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 873.
*
Keywords
Chemical Education Research; Constructivism; First-Year Undergraduate / General; High School / Introductory Chemistry; Learning Theories; Problem Solving / Decision Making; Professional Development; Standards National / State
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
5/5/2008
5/7/2008
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2008  > June  > Page 873


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.