JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print
   Current Issue
 Previous Issues
 Supplements
 Search JCE Index

JCE Digital Library
   DigiDemos
 QBank
 SymMath
 WebWare

JCE Software
   Latest Releases
 Software & Video
 Downloads
 Support

Only@JCE Online
   JCE Online Store
 JCE HS CLIC
 JCE Discussion Forums
   Biographical Snapshots
 ChemEd Resource Shelf
 Featured Molecules
 Hal's Picks
 Project Chemlab
 Reviewed WWW Sites
 "Web-Ed" Articles

About JCE
   Features
 Publications
 Operations
 Outreach
 Contact Us


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 1999  > January  >
In the Classroom
Amounts Tables as a Diagnostic Tool for Flawed Stoichiometric Reasoning
John Olmsted III
California State University, Fullerton, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Fullerton, CA 92834-6866
Cover
January 1999
Vol. 76 No. 1
p. 52
Abstract
A table of amounts listing initial concentrations, changes in concentration, and concentrations at equilibrium is a standard feature of general chemistry equilibrium calculations. Amounts tables can also be used to organize the data and reasoning involved in limiting-reagent problems. In this context, amounts tables can provide useful diagnostic information about students' abilities to reason stoichiometrically. As an illustration, second-semester general chemistry students were given a diagnostic test requiring them to construct an amounts table for a simple limiting-reagent problem. The test question had simple but not 1:1 stoichiometry, and the starting amounts were chosen so that the reactant present in larger amount was limiting. Fewer than half the students showed a good grasp of stoichiometric reasoning using amounts tables, despite having successfully completed first-semester general chemistry and having access to a text that presented amounts tables as a stoichiometric tool. About half the weak students showed some ability to reason stoichiometrically but made errors that indicated an imperfect understanding. The others showed nearly complete ignorance of how to reason stoichiometrically. The entries in amounts tables also made it clear that some students adopt algorithms as a way of "solving" stoichiometry problems without any understanding of the proper application of such algorithms.
More Information
*  Citation
 Olmsted, John A., III. J. Chem. Educ. 1999 76 52.
*  Keywords
 Teaching / Learning Aids; Teaching/Learning Theory/Practice; Stoichiometry
*  History
 Created:
Last Updated:		 June 15, 1999
June 22, 2005
<< Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article >>
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 1999 > January > Page 52


Subscriptions
 Subscription Info
 Order Forms

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
 JCE HS CLIC

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission
 Contributors' Corner

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
 Recent Advertisers

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.
 Outreach with JCE

Comments to
jceonline@chem.wisc.edu		 Copyright © Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society.
All rights reserved.