JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2008  > November  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
Author of "The Flyleaf Periodic Table" Responds
Roy W. Clark
Department of Chemistry, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132
Cover
November 2008
Vol. 85 No. 11
p. 1493

Full Text

The author replies to Lavelle and Jensen.

Since publication of our letter about the multiple forms of periodic tables presented in the flyleaf of textbooks (1) I have received many replies similar to those of Lavelle and Jensen. To these readers and any others who were puzzled by our recommendation I offer this explanation. After seeing evidence that the flyleaf problem was not being resolved I mistakenly concluded that the prestigious (I thought) IUPAC conclusion would be accepted by all, simply in the name of standardization. I was wrong. As a consequence I now believe that our letter should have advocated the disappearance of the flyleaf periodic table. Chemists are not going to agree on which of the three versions of the periodic table to keep.

Thanks to modern publishing techniques, either in print or in digital formats, there is no longer a problem displaying long-form periodic tables. Therefore I now favor relegating the flyleaf forms to history and shifting the resulting debate to which of the long-form tables is best. There will still be arguments as to which long-form table to use, but these will be healthier arguments than the electron shift agonies of past decades. In my opinion the pedagogical discussion of any unfragmented long-form tables will be more clearly seen as a search for symmetry and order in nature than will any of the subscripted forms.

Literature Cited

  1. Clark, R. W.; White, G. D. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 497.

 

Editor's Note about Periodic Tables

An enormously successful way of summarizing and classifying the physical and chemical properties of the elements and many of their compounds is to display the element symbols in a format that emphasizes similarities and differences by means of graphic design—a periodic table. Notice that I said a periodic table, not the periodic table (1).

See the Editorial “Turning the (Periodic) Tables” from August 2003 (1) for further discussion about including more than just a single periodic table in teaching.

Literature Cited

  1. Moore, J. W. J. Chem. Educ. 2003, 80, 847.
More Information
*
Citation
Clark, Roy W. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 1493.
*
Keywords
Communication / Writing; First-Year Undergraduate / General; High School / Introductory Chemistry; Periodicity / Periodic Table
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
9/19/2008
9/24/2008
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2008  > November  > Page 1493


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.